Yes, and as I mentioned in my original post, I rewrote the default eeprom settings using the write-eeprom.py script.
In any case, here's the config window:
Search found 20 matches
- Thu Apr 26, 2018 4:48 pm
- Forum: Developer Discussions
- Topic: Consistent attitude offset in CF2.0
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2039
- Wed Apr 25, 2018 10:19 pm
- Forum: Developer Discussions
- Topic: Consistent attitude offset in CF2.0
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2039
Consistent attitude offset in CF2.0
Hey guys, I tried installing the bootloader and new firmware on one of the Crazyflie 2.0s and now i see a persistent bias in the attitude. The artificial horizon seems to reflect the manual tilting of the robot, but when kept on a level surface, the horizon shows the attitude bias again. Note that t...
- Wed Apr 04, 2018 5:24 pm
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Testing different LiPos
- Replies: 20
- Views: 13533
Re: Testing different LiPos
Hey hittstick,
How much does each of those Tattu batteries weigh?
How much does each of those Tattu batteries weigh?
- Tue Apr 03, 2018 3:41 pm
- Forum: Developer Discussions
- Topic: CF2 Expansion Board incorrect pin representation
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1371
CF2 Expansion Board incorrect pin representation
Hey guys, I think I found a discrepancy in the Rev.C schematic and the expansion pinout above. I think the UART2 Rx/TX lines are marked incorrectly in the expansion board. It should be USART2_TX. Also, N_IO_1 on the expansion board pinout should be: N_IO_2 Can you please confirm? Thanks! Expansion B...
- Tue Apr 03, 2018 1:23 pm
- Forum: Developer Discussions
- Topic: Crazyflie2.0 Rev.C vs Rev.D
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1830
Re: Crazyflie2.0 Rev.C vs Rev.D
Perfect! Thanks!
- Tue Apr 03, 2018 1:22 pm
- Forum: Developer Discussions
- Topic: RFX2401C Schematic difference
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1730
Re: RFX2401C Schematic difference
Aah! that's exactly the answer I was hoping for
Thanks arnaud!
Thanks arnaud!
- Sun Apr 01, 2018 7:13 pm
- Forum: Developer Discussions
- Topic: RFX2401C Schematic difference
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1730
Re: RFX2401C Schematic difference
And this is what the datasheet for the antenna suggests:
Any ideas, anyone?
So basically, the CF2 Rev.C doesn't match any of the suggested RF biasing :/Any ideas, anyone?
- Sun Apr 01, 2018 6:54 pm
- Forum: Developer Discussions
- Topic: RFX2401C Schematic difference
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1730
RFX2401C Schematic difference
Hi all, The Crazyflie2.0 Rev.C schematic for the RF stage of the RFX2401C is significantly different from the suggested circuit. Does his affect the performance in any way? If not, on what basis was the C-L-L network chosen? Here's what the RFX2401C suggests: RFX2401C.JPG And here's what the crazyfl...
- Fri Mar 30, 2018 9:26 pm
- Forum: Developer Discussions
- Topic: Crazyflie2.0 Rev.C vs Rev.D
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1830
Crazyflie2.0 Rev.C vs Rev.D
Hello all,
Does any one know the difference between revisions C and D for the Crazyflie 2.0?
I see that though the project is advertised as open source, the schematics for Rev.D (available COTS) are not available on the wiki.
Is that true? Or am I missing something?
Thanks!
Does any one know the difference between revisions C and D for the Crazyflie 2.0?
I see that though the project is advertised as open source, the schematics for Rev.D (available COTS) are not available on the wiki.
Is that true? Or am I missing something?
Thanks!
- Wed Mar 28, 2018 7:24 pm
- Forum: Developer Discussions
- Topic: CF2.0 Hardware upgrade
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2562
CF2.0 Hardware upgrade
Hello all,
I am designing a new robot and was wondering if there was any progress on releasing the updated kicad project?
It would be awesome if the new design can be binary compatible with the CF2.
Thanks!
I am designing a new robot and was wondering if there was any progress on releasing the updated kicad project?
It would be awesome if the new design can be binary compatible with the CF2.
Thanks!