Search found 51 matches
- Tue Jul 02, 2013 5:16 pm
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Non null thrust on connect
- Replies: 10
- Views: 8103
Re: Non null thrust on connect
Hello Marcus, I like your thought, set the current "Emergency Stop" to On, requiring "Arm" button press before thrust can be applied. That would be a significant improvement and one that could rapidly be deployed if connection is lost during flight. Even so, if you pick up the co...
- Mon Jul 01, 2013 2:56 pm
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Non null thrust on connect
- Replies: 10
- Views: 8103
Re: Non null thrust on connect
Seems like a potential safety issue. On connect, why should a non-null value for thrust be permitted? On connection, wouldn't it be better to zero the value and throw a warning to the user before allowing a fly-away? Or even some kind of general "safety interlock" on the controller to ensu...
Re: Layout
You might want to check Ebay!
- Thu Jun 20, 2013 7:53 pm
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Future
- Replies: 7
- Views: 7607
Re: Future
Congratulations on the volume of posts! We're all glad to see this level of participation, I'm sure. I believe you've answered my question. An advanced Crazyflie would be a complete re-design of the board and that offers an opportunity for new features. It doesn't seem like a LQFP48 would be practic...
- Wed Jun 19, 2013 7:17 pm
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Future
- Replies: 7
- Views: 7607
Re: Future
Regarding the future, any thoughts relative to updating the MCU to the binary-compatable STM32F4*? I wonder if it would not make a direct interface to a nano digital video camera, and related processing/transfer of images via Crazyradio, a somewhat more practical. Just wondering if there's any think...
- Wed Jun 19, 2013 3:51 pm
- Forum: Quadcopters
- Topic: Convert crazyflie to tricopter
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5997
Re: Convert crazyflie to tricopter
If the port never worked, why not get a replacement board? Would be easier. Payload weight would be reduced for tricopter!
- Thu Jun 13, 2013 6:37 am
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Beginner protection ring
- Replies: 19
- Views: 20826
Re: Beginner protection ring
I agree that the dart solution is good for protecting the bottom of the motors.
The frames described above also encompass the motor bottoms but additionally protect the rotors from damage in the X-Y plane of the Crazyflie. Some of the newer designs also protect the top 'flie.
Rich
The frames described above also encompass the motor bottoms but additionally protect the rotors from damage in the X-Y plane of the Crazyflie. Some of the newer designs also protect the top 'flie.
Rich
- Mon Jun 10, 2013 8:08 pm
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Beginner protection ring
- Replies: 19
- Views: 20826
Re: Beginner protection ring
Yes, designs over a few grams are going to be too heavy. A tough problem.
Rich
Rich
- Mon Jun 10, 2013 7:54 pm
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Suggestion regards motor dents
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3334
Suggestion regards motor dents
I think I've realized that the greatest risk of damage to the Crazyflie in a crash is that contact between the edges of the pcb and motor cans. After many crashes and manual deformations to try to remove dents, I've had to replace 2 motors from that so far. Those repairs put the main board at risk g...
- Mon Jun 10, 2013 6:47 pm
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Construction
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4189
Re: Construction
I agree with foosel. Adding deadzone e. Even a slight dent in the motor case can affect motor performance in a big way.
Rich
Rich