Bitcraze Forums

Hello all, Sorry @taochen_bitcraze for the very late response. I guess you have figured your way out of that situation. Anyways I recently pushed on the master branch something more compatible with recent version of bitcraze master branch firmware + full compatibility with crazyflie_ros (which wasn'...

Oups it looks like your are not using the correct branch. Which branch are you using ? (I know the names sucks xD) But you should point on multi-uav-final (NOT multi-uav-fix) and be sure that crazyflie-firmware point to that same branch and the same for external/crazyflie_comm. If you look at that b...

Hi Burak, If you had a look at the docu on github you will see my computer specs : Intel® Core™ i7-8650U CPU @ 1.90GHz × 8 and 15.6 Gb of RAM and it is a LAPTOP computer : a DELL Latitude 7490. No I didn't use any tools to share the workload between threads/cores. However I have not tested simulatio...

Hi, I have recently push some modifications on the multi-uav-final branch. You will have to clone/pull the project and go to that branch for sim_cf. Be sure that the submodules external/crazyflie_comm and crazyflie-firmware also points to multi-uav-final branch. This branch breaks most of the things...

OK it seems the head of my submodules are detached for my multi-uav-fix branch. You need to go inside crazyflie-firmware/ and crazyflie_gazebo/external/crazyflie_comm/ and make this submodules to point to their master branch in order to be able to test the multi-uav-fix branch. I didn't put any info...

Hi, Sorry I was busy recently on my main project. However if you check my github you will see on the multi-cf-test branch the last modifications I made that work pretty well with at least 4 crazyflies (I included a launch file and a python script in order to test it).Please Tell me how it behaves on...

Hi,
Interesting what you are saying ! Before testing that path (and Yes it is possible to implement something like that ), I'm currently working on another alternative. Maybe I will combine the two at the end (?).
I will keep you updated when things will be better with multiple cf.

I just updated the git. You should have a working example with two quads using only .launch file and I fixed the problem you mentioned above. However even just 2 quads in SITL on the same computer seems a lot (as you will (or not) see). I will try to see what can be done to reduce the computational ...

Hi, Normally, this could be done thanks to the mav.launch file but I have a bug with it at the moment. I'm working on :) Another way to do it, is to duplicate the crazyflie_gazebo/models/crazyflie and just specify differents namespace and uri in the crazyflie_gazebo/models/crazyflie/crazyflie.sdf . ...

Hi, There is the link for my current version : https://github.com/wuwushrek/sim_cf . I added a small installation tuto and you can use the test_high_level.py in crazyflie_gazebo/scripts for testing the high level control. After that, normally you will be able to use whatever code you have written us...