It is better to use all the propellers with the highest values. Because this propellers course not only less vibration but they have also better buoyancy (boost ).
BTW: Energy consumption and sound of the CF is also better
Tuning worth it!
Best regards,
DesTinY
Search found 97 matches
- Mon Dec 09, 2013 12:28 am
- Forum: Developer Discussions
- Topic: Balancing during the assembly
- Replies: 62
- Views: 52445
- Mon Dec 02, 2013 9:03 pm
- Forum: Developer Discussions
- Topic: Balancing during the assembly
- Replies: 62
- Views: 52445
Re: Balancing during the assembly
Hi, first of all thanks for the kind words. Sorry for the delay, I am currently very busy with my bachelor thesis and can just follow the posts in the moment. But I want to complete my work for an request for integration in to the Main PC client. (BTW: Help are welcome :) ) The LED strobe concept is...
- Thu Aug 29, 2013 5:31 pm
- Forum: Quadcopters
- Topic: The smallest autopilot in the world is open source
- Replies: 1
- Views: 4814
The smallest autopilot in the world is open source
Is a Pico Copter the next big thing?!?
I think "Everything can fly!" in the near future...
FYI: http://paparazzi.enac.fr/wiki/Lisa/S
- Sun Aug 18, 2013 6:46 pm
- Forum: Developer Discussions
- Topic: Working FPV Camera setup with realtime HUD
- Replies: 57
- Views: 64848
Re: Working FPV Camera setup with realtime HUD
Looks great! Two suggestions from my site:
-holder model with just 2 or 3 arms
-cam holder with/of soft material for less vibrations. Maybe two parts.
-holder model with just 2 or 3 arms
-cam holder with/of soft material for less vibrations. Maybe two parts.
- Thu Aug 08, 2013 6:34 am
- Forum: Developer Discussions
- Topic: Working FPV Camera setup with realtime HUD
- Replies: 57
- Views: 64848
Re: AW: Working FPV setup with realtime HUD
Really cool! Great work!
Have you tried to fly in X-mode and place the cam between the motors. Result: No motor in the picture and not only the front motor must carry the most.
BTW: Please check your links.
Thanks for posting your great work. An inspiring all of us.
Have you tried to fly in X-mode and place the cam between the motors. Result: No motor in the picture and not only the front motor must carry the most.
BTW: Please check your links.
Thanks for posting your great work. An inspiring all of us.
- Mon Jul 29, 2013 7:04 pm
- Forum: Support
- Topic: android setup
- Replies: 24
- Views: 20657
Re: android setup
Also a possible CF APP setup with external controller (wired):
SixaxisController (root needed) to fly wireless (via bluetooth) with my PS3 controller and the smartphone in the pocket.
Now, i use the App - Mon Jul 29, 2013 6:25 pm
- Forum: Support
- Topic: android setup
- Replies: 24
- Views: 20657
Re: android setup
The API (sdk) min level for the CF APP is the problem. see Code
For example Android 2.1.x is API level 7.
You can try this (at your one risk):
Code: Select all
<uses-sdk
android:minSdkVersion="13"
android:targetSdkVersion="15" />
You can try this (at your one risk):
- Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:51 am
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Tethered flight
- Replies: 6
- Views: 5101
Re: Tethered flight
From my point of view it is not recommended to fly longer than 15-20 minutes, because the motors will heat up and that decrease the lifetime of the motor extremely.
- Mon Jul 15, 2013 5:19 pm
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: sketchup model
- Replies: 13
- Views: 12378
- Mon Jul 08, 2013 11:36 pm
- Forum: Developer Discussions
- Topic: Crazyflie w/ Double Motors
- Replies: 47
- Views: 49410
Re: Crazyflie w/ Double Motors
So the conclusion is that I need some good landing gear and probably to attach the motors so they don't slide out. I want to use hotglue for the motors, but if I need to exchange one of the motors I don't think I'll be able to... Maybe you can solder two motors with a stiff wire like this: cf_dual_...